If you’ve been searching “PRF under eye treatment near me” or trying to figure out whether PRP or PRF works better for dark circles, hollowness, or crepey under-eye skin, you’ve probably noticed something:

Every medspa says theirs is the best.

We won’t do that here.

At SD Weight Loss Center in Spring Valley, CA, we use both PRP and PRF — and we choose based on anatomy, age, skin quality, and what you’re actually trying to fix.

No one-size-fits-all answer. No injector buzzwords. No filters doing the heavy lifting.

Just results that still look like you.

First — What’s Really Causing Under-Eye Issues?

Most patients come in thinking they have “dark circles.”

But under the light, it’s usually one (or a mix) of:

• hollowing from volume loss
• visible blood vessels under thin skin
• crepey texture from collagen decline
• lingering pigment from inflammation
• genetic anatomy that exaggerates shadowing

That’s why two people with “dark circles”
need two different treatments.

Before we recommend PRP or PRF,
we look at:

• skin thickness
• fat pad position
• tear trough depth
• previous filler or surgery
• lifestyle + general health

If you’re not a good candidate,
we’ll say so — before you spend a dollar.

PRP vs PRF — The Difference in Plain English

Both come from your own blood.

What changes is how it’s processed
and how long growth factors stay active.

PRP — Platelet-Rich Plasma

We draw blood → spin it fast → separate the platelet layer.

It delivers:

• growth factors
• wound-healing signals
• collagen stimulation

PRP absorbs more quickly,
so the response happens sooner.

Good for:

• mild texture improvement
• very fine lines
• early collagen support

—

PRF — Platelet-Rich Fibrin

We draw blood → spin it more slowly → keep a fibrin matrix intact.

That fibrin structure works like a slow-release net, letting growth factors disperse gradually over days instead of minutes.

Think of it this way:

• PRP = quick spark
• PRF = slow-burn remodeling

PRF is usually our go-to for:

• hollow tear troughs
• crepey under-eye skin
• areas where skin is thin or fragile
• patients wanting subtle, natural lift

We don’t “sell” PRF —
we use it where biology says it makes sense.

Why So Many People Prefer PRF Under the Eyes

Most fillers look great in cheeks.

Under the eye?

That’s where things can go wrong fast.

PRF tends to look more natural because:

• it doesn’t create puffiness
• it blends with tissue instead of sitting on top
• light reflects more evenly across the area
• results build gradually instead of showing up overnight

The change is subtle in the best way.

You look rested —
not “done.”

What Treatment Feels Like

No needles-of-doom moment.

We numb the area first.

The injections are:

• shallow
• controlled
• placed conservatively

Most patients describe it as:

“a tiny pressure and then it’s over.”

Mild swelling is normal for a day or two.

You may look “puffy but rested”
before things settle and tighten.

We’ll tell you exactly what to expect beforehand —
no surprises.

When PRP Makes More Sense

We’ll lean PRP instead of PRF when:

• the goal is brighter skin tone
• fine lines are superficial
• the patient is younger with early changes
• we’re stacking with microneedling or laser

Sometimes we even combine approaches:

PRF in hollow areas
PRP for texture + tone

It’s not about which is “better.”

It’s about which is right for that one face in that one chair.

How Many Sessions You’ll Likely Need

Honest expectations — not marketing copy:

• PRP: usually 2–3 sessions
• PRF: usually 2–4 sessions

Spaced:

4–6 weeks apart

Because collagen works on its own timeline.

You don’t walk out a different person.

You look like yourself
with fewer shadows and softer texture
a few months later.

Which is the point.

Who Is NOT a Good Candidate

We’ll avoid or delay treatment if you have:

• active autoimmune flares
• significant orbital fat herniation
• severe tear trough laxity
• untreated anemia or thyroid dysfunction
• filler migration already present

We don’t force “regenerative solutions”
onto structural problems.

If surgery or filler reversal is the right move,
we’ll say it plainly.

That honesty is why people stay with us.

PRF vs Filler — Which Is Better?

They do different jobs.

Filler replaces lost volume.

PRF improves tissue quality.

We choose based on:

• thickness of skin
• hollowness vs shadowing
• anatomy + risk profile

Some patients do best with:

light filler + PRF support

Others do best with:

PRF only + collagen-first strategy

You’ll never be pushed toward filler here “just because it’s faster.”

FAQs

“Is PRF better than PRP under the eyes?”
PRF lasts longer in tissue and often looks more natural in hollow areas and thin skin.

“How long do PRF under-eye results last?”
Most patients see gradual improvement over 6–12 months with maintenance as needed.

“Is PRF safer than filler?”
PRF carries lower risk of puffiness or migration because it integrates with natural tissue.

“How many sessions do I need?”
Typically 2–4 spaced 4–6 weeks apart.

Why People Choose Our Clinic

Because we don’t chase trends.

We:

• evaluate anatomy honestly
• avoid aggressive volume work under the eye
• prioritize natural-looking outcomes
• treat the face the way we treat health — thoughtfully

You won’t get a hard sell here.

You’ll get straight talk and a plan that respects your features.

If you want to see whether PRF or PRP makes more sense for your under-eye area, come in and let us examine things in good light.

We’ll tell you exactly what’s realistic — and what isn’t.

SD Weight Loss Center — real medicine, real care, real people, right here in Spring Valley.